They say that blog writing is all about attention grabbing so I hope my cheesy title to this post will do the trick. Technically I have stretched the point: Xavier Vignon's gorgeous wine is called "SM" according to the label but the letters in question stand for Septrionale (the French name for the Northern Rhone) and Meridionale (you guessed it, the Southern Rhone) so, given that this is a blend of grapes from both regions, S&M is really what it should be called.
Not just any grapes, of course. The S could also stand for Syrah, the Northern Rhone's only permitted red grape (there's a statement that's bound to get a response - someone will assuredly know of a wine with something else in it that started out red) and not just any Syrah but Syrah from Cote Rotie which, along with Hermitage produces the best wines in the region.
In its original outing, "SM" was called "Sacrilege" because Xavier thought purists would find it borderline offensive that anyone would mix grapes from such an exalted Syrah vineyard with Grenache from the south, especially when the Grenache in question was grown in Chateauneuf-du-Pape. This landed him in trouble though as, when he labelled the wine Cotes du Rhone, he was told this was outside the regulations. Chateauneuf-du-Pape wines, it seems, cannot be downgraded except to lowly Vin de France. "Sacrilege" became one of the most exulted (and expensive) Vin de France bottles that year.
The next time around, he sourced his Grenache from Gigondas which meant he could label it as Cotes du Rhone. I'm not altogether sure why. The story of a Cote Rotie/Chateauneuf blend bottled as Vin de France probably has more about it than a Cote Rotie/Gigondas Cotes du Rhone but, hey, it's all good wine so I'm not complaining.
What about the wine, then? It's powerful yet restrained on the palate, forceful yet demure. A mass of contradictions except insofar as it is good. No, it's very good. More important in the context of this blog is that it goes outrageously well with brisket of beef, at least it does the way we have it here.
Sauce – cook up:
1 onion, chopped and softened
1/2 red pepper, chopped and added to the onion
2 cloves garlic, as above
1 red chilli (optional)
1-2 tins of tomatoes (according to preference)
Salt & pepper
1 tsp smoked paprika
2 tsp oregano
1 tsp ground cumin
Beef stock (if the meat was cooked sous vide, there will be some liquid with this which should also be added to the sauce - no reason to waste it!)_Serve with diced chips or with salad (or both) in home-made wraps.
Not just any grapes, of course. The S could also stand for Syrah, the Northern Rhone's only permitted red grape (there's a statement that's bound to get a response - someone will assuredly know of a wine with something else in it that started out red) and not just any Syrah but Syrah from Cote Rotie which, along with Hermitage produces the best wines in the region.
In its original outing, "SM" was called "Sacrilege" because Xavier thought purists would find it borderline offensive that anyone would mix grapes from such an exalted Syrah vineyard with Grenache from the south, especially when the Grenache in question was grown in Chateauneuf-du-Pape. This landed him in trouble though as, when he labelled the wine Cotes du Rhone, he was told this was outside the regulations. Chateauneuf-du-Pape wines, it seems, cannot be downgraded except to lowly Vin de France. "Sacrilege" became one of the most exulted (and expensive) Vin de France bottles that year.
The next time around, he sourced his Grenache from Gigondas which meant he could label it as Cotes du Rhone. I'm not altogether sure why. The story of a Cote Rotie/Chateauneuf blend bottled as Vin de France probably has more about it than a Cote Rotie/Gigondas Cotes du Rhone but, hey, it's all good wine so I'm not complaining.
What about the wine, then? It's powerful yet restrained on the palate, forceful yet demure. A mass of contradictions except insofar as it is good. No, it's very good. More important in the context of this blog is that it goes outrageously well with brisket of beef, at least it does the way we have it here.
This can be cooked slowly in a conventional oven but it really is best cooked sous vide at 70°C for 30 hours or so, in which case trim as much fat off as possible, coat with Dijon mustard and rub in the marinade, seal and start cooking (no need to marinade although it won’t hurt). When it's finished in the sous vide, it should be seared in a frying pan or, better still, over a hot barbeque. Serve with the sauce below. Any leftover meat should be chopped into the sauce and served up with a baked potato as an alternative to chilli. So, that's two meals in one.
1 tsp garlic powder
1 tsp onion powder
1 tsp ground black pepperSauce – cook up:
1 onion, chopped and softened
1/2 red pepper, chopped and added to the onion
2 cloves garlic, as above
1 red chilli (optional)
1-2 tins of tomatoes (according to preference)
Salt & pepper
1 tsp smoked paprika
2 tsp oregano
1 tsp ground cumin
Beef stock (if the meat was cooked sous vide, there will be some liquid with this which should also be added to the sauce - no reason to waste it!)_Serve with diced chips or with salad (or both) in home-made wraps.
Comments
Post a Comment